https://rumble.com/vdffhx-peer-reviewed-journal-reports-hydroxychloroquine-can-reduce-mortality-rates.html

Video of interview: last 14 min info if you already took vax. I wrote out 13 natural things you can do to combat the harm.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/31/covid-19-vaccine-gene-therapy.aspx Follow this link to watch the video

Written interview below. Last few pages about those who have taken it

https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/ExpertInterviewTranscripts/DrMercola-JudyMikovits-COVID-19-Vaccination.pdf

What can you do after you get the Experimental Gene Therapy:

1. Detox of heavy metals that cause autoimmune diseases
2. Prevent Inflammation
3. Fortify your immune system: Same protocol as preventing the china virus
4. Quercitin
5. Verbarin
6. Burn Ketones (ketone esters are expensive but work well)
7. PH Diet, including Water therapy (1/4-1/2 t. baking soda in water 1-3 times daily) organic food. can add 1/2 t. glycine 3x a day to combat neuro inflammation. Get litmus paper to test urine. 7.4 is perfect. Add baking soda til achieve this level. Potassium Bicarb can replace or rotate with baking soda.
8. Need to activate NRF2 pathways. Drink Molecular Hydrogen daily. 2-4 servings
9. Cinnamon Bark
10. MCT oils
11. Alpha Interferrons are healing
12. Berberion?
13. Type 1 Interferon spray if get symptoms
14. Nebulized Hydrogen Peroxide Therapy helps if get symptoms
15. Peptide Tea

https://rumble.com/vctx45-covid-and-the-vaccine.html. More info from dr Gold

After 440,000 Americans are Dead – Facebook and American Journal of Medicine Admit Their Stand on HCQ was Wrong — These People Should be Prosecuted!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/440000-americans-dead-facebook-american-journal-medicine-admit-stand-hcq-wrong-people-prosecuted/?fbclid=IwAR2MTsrlNL3DdqHBiIVLZhj88YZ0tl5hqq9zopwJEXMopEwMcdj5vkltM-0

Benefits as to why I should be vaccinated:

1. Can I stop wearing a mask?
2. Can you guarantee I won’t be harmed or even die from the vaccine ?
3. Can I sue anyone if I am injured or die?
4. Can you guarantee I won’t ever get COVID?
   Maybe, but they don’t know exactly. It probably won’t stop me getting it.
5. Can they reopen restaurants etc and everyone work normally?
6. At least I won’t be contagious to others, right?
   No, I can still pass it on, maybe…nobody knows.
7. If we vaccinate children, will schools resume normally?
8. If I’m vaccinated, can I stop social distancing?
9. Will movie theaters, stadiums etc. be reopened thanks to vaccines?
   No
10. Will the vaccinated be able to gather?
11. What’s the real benefit to vaccination?
    The virus won’t kill you.
12. If statistically the virus doesn’t kill me anyway, why would I get vaccinated?
    To protect others.
13. So if I get vaccinated, is everyone sure that I’m not infecting them?
    No.
14. See www.hereistheevidence.com
15. See Dr Simone Gold video below

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m6nDw0zgztPH/

So, the vaccine doesn’t give immunity.
Doesn’t eliminate the virus.
Doesn’t prevent death.
Doesn’t guarantee you won’t get COVID.
Doesn’t prevent you from getting COVID.
Doesn’t stop you from passing it on.
Doesn’t eliminate the need for travel bans.
Doesn’t eliminate the need for business closures.
Doesn’t eliminate the need for lockdowns.
Doesn’t eliminate the need for masks.

So…why should I be vaccinated?????

https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/55-people-died-in-us-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccines-reporting-system_3659152.html?v=ul

https://www.facebook.com/1830108417/posts/10214422517076642/?d=n

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MBr3Jsl00bCy/

https://fb.watch/2WhtyrLwik/

PCR diagnostic tests are inaccurate 96-97% of the time as ruled by German courts! The German Courts!!This is not conspiracy theory!Does that mean A COVID test has a 96% chance of inaccuracy?Article By Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.Tested positive? There could be as little as a 3% chance it’s correct This is not the first challenge to the credibility of PCR tests. Many people will be aware that their results have a lot to do with the number of amplifications that are performed, or the ‘cycle threshold.’ This number in most American and European labs is 35–40 cycles, but experts have claimed that even 35 cycles is far too many, and that a more reasonable protocol would call for 25–30 cycles. (Each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample).Earlier this year, data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – showed that when the amount of the virus found in a person was taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who tested positive could actually have been negative, as they may have been carrying only tiny amounts of the virus.The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.Sshhh – don’t tell anyoneIt is a sad indictment of our mainstream media that such a landmark ruling, of such obvious and pressing international importance, has been roundly ignored. If one were making (flimsy) excuses for them, one could say that the case escaped the notice of most science editors because it has been published in Portuguese. But there is a full English translation of the appeal, and alternative media managed to pick it up.And it isn’t as if Portugal is some remote, mysterious nation where news is unreliable or whose judges are suspect – this is a western EU country with a large population and a similar legal system to many other parts of Europe. And it is not the only country whose institutions are clashing with received wisdom on Covid. Finland’s national health authority has disputed the WHO’s recommendation to test as many people as possible for coronavirus, saying it would be a waste of taxpayer’s money, while poorer South East Asian countries are holding off on ordering vaccines, citing an improper use of finite resources. Testing, especially PCR testing, is the basis for the entire house of cards of Covid restrictions that are wreaking havoc worldwide. From testing comes case numbers. From case numbers come the ‘R number,’ the rate at which a carrier infects others. From the ‘dreaded’ R number comes the lockdowns and the restrictions, such as England’s new and baffling tiered restrictions that come into force next week. The daily barrage of statistics is familiar to us all by this point, but as time goes on the evidence that something may be deeply amiss with the whole foundation of our reaction to this pandemic – the testing regime – continues to mount.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/